Philosophical Productive Discussion

[benji]

The zoning decision I quoted was requiring state approval to engage in legal speech on private property. You don't like their decision, that's fine, take it up with them. That's what they're doing. I'm just the messenger.

Your citation does not require every person who wishes to view any motion picture anywhere to get state approval to do so. That's what a law requiring you to confirm your identity with the state before being allowed to view any website would be equivalent to.

edit: In fact the very next part of what you cited explains how an attempt to even limit certain websites would not be content-neutral as you're trying to argue.