Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 2)

[Lonewulfeus]

You can be in support of IVF and not be a natalist. It's very common actually and we should normalize the practice as many people need to use it if they want to have children. Sharma kinda veers into the natalist rhetoric by worrying about birth rates and such, so I get the concern behind it as it can create a slippery slope, but talking about declining birth rates in general doesn't make you a eugenicist. Basically just be normal when talking about people having kids and how they do it.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/asha-sharma-new-xbox-ceo-is-a-natalist-who-believes-that-ai-can-improve-fertility-rates-will-my-son-have-classmates-in-the-future.1442539/post-151649569

Every once in a while someone comes into the thread and notices that she didn't actually say any of the things Zeo is accusing her off

Zeo never misses an opportunity to take a woman down a peg